As is often true of contested judicial elections around the US, the Montana Supreme Court race between Dirk Sandefur and Kristen Juras involved a funding battle between businesses and the trial lawyers who sue them. According to the Montana Standard,
More than $1.1 million has been raised by Juras, Sandefur and organizations supporting their campaigns, according to state campaign finance records. The Republican State Leadership Committee’s Judicial Fairness Initiative, a DC-based political group funded primarily by large corporations, has bought ads to attack Sandefur, while various political action committees of the Montana Trial Lawyers Association have lined up to oppose Juras in what could be another record-setting fundraising year.
Sandefur won the election.
Judicial elections, democratic appointment (e.g., senate confirmation), and the Missouri Plan (a/k/a "merit selection")
Search This Blog
Monday, November 21, 2016
Friday, November 4, 2016
Judicial Selection in Ireland
Judicial selection in Ireland is the subject of a book by Jennifer Carroll MacNeill, "The politics of judicial selection in Ireland."
Reviewed in the Irish Times.
Reviewed in the Irish Times.
Tuesday, November 1, 2016
Kansas Supreme Court Elections -- Competing Video Ads
Kansans for Fair Courts supporting retention of Kansas Supreme Court justices:
Kansans for Justice opposing retention of Kansas Supreme Court justices:
Kansans for Justice opposing retention of Kansas Supreme Court justices:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)